Alex+Criteria

1.) In my opinion, good art has to have a definite, clear shape that actually shows what the thing is. I cannot stand looking at art that has no clear shape, and I have to look at it for hours, just to get no where. I like for the picture to tell its story clearly, without the hassle.

2.) In my opinion, good art needs to tell a story, and a clear story that sticks out separates itself from a group of artwork.

3.) In my opinion, good art needs to use color to show emotion. Like in Picasso's blue period, the blue shows clearly the emotion being portrayed in the series of photos.

4.) In my opinion, good art should use line and pattern to make the picture connect and unify. If it's not unified, I don't want to look at it.

5.) In my opinion, good art make you look at it, and admire it wholeheartedly, to where you're simply amazed.

6.) In my opinion, art has to be seen in context.

Jessica stockhodler is a terrible artist, even so she met only citeria point 2. Her work does tell a deeper meaning, even though to someone hearing it it may not fit with it. Her artwork based on this is terrible work.

COMPARING CHAGALL TO STOCKHOLDER


==I LIKE CHAGALL BETTER THAN JESSICA STOCKHOLDER, IN THAT CHAGALL DOESN'T JUST TAKE SOMETHING MAN-MADE LIKE STOCKHOLDER AND PUT INTO SOMETHING THAT SHE CALLS HER OWN. CHAGALL TAKES HIS BACKGROUND AND PUTS HIS HEART AND SOUL AND KNOWLEDGE INTO A WORK, WHEREAS STOCKHOLDER DOES SOMETHING SIMPLER AND NOT AS MEANINGFUL.==